Outcomes First
Enquiries, calls and revenue where measurable — before any platform metric.
Most PPC reports contain everything and answer nothing. Impressions, click-through rate, quality score, twenty charts — and no clear statement of what the money produced. PPC reporting should answer four questions: what was spent, what came back, what we changed, and what happens next.
If nothing in the report would change what anyone does, it is documentation rather than reporting.
Enquiries, calls and revenue where measurable — before any platform metric.
What we altered and why, so results can be attributed rather than guessed at.
By service, product or area, because a blended number hides the decision.
Where volume is too low to conclude anything, the report says so rather than narrating variance.
Impressions and click-through rate are diagnostics, not results, and are not presented as results.
Four reasons, and all of them are about the report rather than the reader.
See a Sample Report →Twelve platform metrics and no statement of what the business received.
Performance moved and nothing explains whether that was us, the market, or the season.
One cost-per-lead figure averaging services with completely different economics.
A slow fortnight in a low-volume account explained as a trend.
The four questions, answered at whatever cadence is genuinely useful.
Reporting is only as honest as the tracking underneath it — see conversion tracking.
The format is agreed at the start, against what decisions the report needs to support.
Which outcomes the business actually judges this on.
Reporting on broken tracking produces confident nonsense.
Which breakdowns are decision-relevant, and which are noise.
What happened, what we changed, and what we could not attribute.
Occasionally check that anyone is using it, and cut what nobody reads.
Most reporting failures are interpretation failures rather than data failures.
Because it averages across things with different values. A practice generating routine enquiries at low cost and high-value cases at high cost has a blended figure that describes neither.
Worse, the blend usually improves when the cheaper leads increase — which is the opposite of what the business wanted. The number goes the right way while the outcome goes the wrong way.
Segmenting by service, product or campaign makes the trade-off visible. It usually makes the headline figure look worse, which is the point.
When the conversion volume behind it is small. Ten conversions a month will vary by several either way for entirely random reasons, and a report narrating that variation as performance is inventing a story.
The honest treatment is to state the volume alongside the change, and to say plainly when a period is too short to conclude anything. That is less satisfying than an explanation and considerably more useful.
It also protects the account: reacting to noise is the most common way a working account gets destabilised.







What was spent, what came back, what changed and why, and what happens next. Platform metrics belong in the diagnosis, not in the summary.
Monthly suits most accounts. Weekly reporting is worthwhile only where conversion volume is high enough for a week to mean something — otherwise it reports variance as if it were performance.
A dashboard shows what happened; it does not say what was changed, what could not be attributed, or what should happen next. Those are judgements, and they are the part worth paying for.
For ecommerce, yes — with the caveat that return on revenue is not return on margin. Where margins differ across the catalogue, ROAS can rise while profit falls; see ecommerce PPC.
The report says so, with what we think caused it and what we intend to do. A report that only explains good months is not a report.
Still deciding if ppc reporting is right for you?
Talk to UsClick-through rate, impression share and quality score all respond quickly to work and all appear prominently in most reports. None of them is what the business is buying.
They are diagnostics — useful for understanding why something happened, misleading as evidence that something worked. An account can improve all three while producing fewer enquiries, and reports built around them will describe that as progress.
The awkward part is that outcome reporting is less flattering. Fewer things move, movements are slower, and some months there is nothing to claim. That is what an honest report looks like.
Send us your last PPC report. We will tell you what it does and does not let you conclude, and what would need to change for it to support a decision.
