Full Site Crawl
We crawl your site like Google does and surface every broken link, redirect loop, and dead end costing you rankings.
Technical SEO Services
Technical SEO Services That Fix Hidden Ranking Issues
Great content will not rank if Google cannot crawl, read, or load your pages fast enough. Technical SEO removes those roadblocks by fixing site speed optimization, indexability, crawlability and structure. We start with a full technical SEO audit, then fix what it finds — so every page you publish gets the ranking it deserves.
Site Health ScannerInteractive · Only on this page
A Technical SEO Audit Comes First
Every ranking problem has a root cause, and most live in the technical layer. A Technical SEO audit shows exactly what's stopping Google from crawling, indexing, and trusting your pages — so you stop guessing and fix what actually moves rankings.
0/100
Site Health Score
- CrawlabilityWaiting
- IndexabilityWaiting
- Core Web VitalsWaiting
- Site speedWaiting
- Mobile usabilityWaiting
- XML sitemapWaiting
- Schema markupWaiting
- Broken links & redirectsWaiting
8 checks · the same categories a real Skyline Grow technical audit covers. Scores shown are a fictional example. — this demo is illustrative and does not crawl your site. For a real audit, book a free scan.
Why Choose Skyline Grow for Technical SEO
Most agencies chase keywords and ignore the foundation. We go under the hood — the errors quietly capping your rankings no matter how much content you add.
Speed Optimization
Slow pages lose rankings and customers. We trim the code, images, and scripts dragging your load times down.
Fix, Don't Just Report
You get problems solved, not a 60-page PDF. We hand back a faster, cleaner site — not homework.
Ongoing Monitoring
Sites break silently after updates. We watch for new crawl errors and speed drops before they hurt you.
Clear Reporting
You see what was broken, what we fixed, and what it means for your rankings — in plain language.
The Numbers We Report On
We do not publish client traffic charts. What we can show you is exactly what gets checked, where the number comes from, and what a healthy result looks like — so you can verify our reporting against your own data.
Indexed vs publishedPages live against pages actually in the index. A wide gap is the clearest sign of a technical problem.
Crawl errorsServer errors, soft 404s, blocked URLs and fetch failures.
Core Web VitalsLCP, INP and CLS at the 75th percentile of real visits, split by mobile and desktop.
Page speedServer response time, render-blocking assets and payload weight.
Internal linkingLinks each important page receives, and which pages are reachable only from the sitemap.
Redirect chainsHops between the URL requested and the one served. Each costs crawl budget and a little equity.
Broken links404s in navigation, body content and sitemaps.
Canonical implementationSelf-referencing canonicals where expected, and any tag contradicting the sitemap.
XML sitemap healthWhether it matches what is genuinely indexable.
Structured dataSchema present, validation errors, and eligibility for the rich results that apply to you.
Mobile usabilityViewport, tap targets, text sizing and layout faults on the device most visitors use.
JavaScript renderingRendered HTML against the initial response — the gap where content silently goes missing.
Every one of these is verifiable in your own Search Console or a crawl you run yourself. Ask any agency for the same list before you sign.
Technical SEO, Explained
What Is Technical SEO?
Technical SEO covers four key areas that decide whether Google can use your site at all.
Audit My Site →- 1
Crawlability
Google can reach and read every important page.
- 2
Indexability
Your pages are eligible to appear in search.
- 3
Site Speed
Pages load fast on every device.
- 4
Structure
Clean architecture, sitemaps, and schema Google understands.
Everything Included in Our Technical SEO Services
A complete website audit, handled end to end.
Core Web Vitals
We fix loading, interactivity, and layout shift so your site passes Google's speed benchmarks.
Crawlability
We open the paths Google needs and remove the blocks hiding your pages.
Indexability
We fix noindex errors, duplicates, and canonicals so the right pages rank.
XML Sitemap
We build and submit a clean sitemap so Google finds every page that matters.
Schema Markup
We add structured data that helps you win rich results in search.
Site Speed Optimization
We compress, cache, and clean code to cut load times site-wide.
Mobile Optimization
We make sure every page works flawlessly on phones, where most searches happen.
Broken Links & Redirects
We fix 404s and redirect chains that leak ranking power.
Website Analysis
We track fixes over time so improvements hold, not slip back.
Technical SEO works best alongside strong on-page SEO — a clean foundation lets your optimized pages rank faster.
Access, Speed, Clarity
A simplified way to think about the technical layer — not a literal checklist Google runs, but the three things every technical fix ultimately serves:
Access
Google can crawl and reach your pages without hitting walls.
Speed
Pages load fast enough to keep both users and Google happy.
Clarity
Clean structure and schema tell Google exactly what each page is.
How Our Technical SEO Process Works
No jargon dump. We run a full diagnostic, fix what is broken, then keep your site clean as it grows. Rankings depend on far more than the technical layer — what this process controls is whether that layer is still standing in your way.
Deep Crawl
We crawl your site the way Googlebot does, with rendering on, and check what we find against Search Console and real-user field data. That gives us the full picture before anything is changed.
Prioritize & Fix
Every issue is ranked by likely impact, not by how alarming it looks in a report. A noindex tag on a money page outranks two hundred cosmetic warnings, and we say so plainly.
Validate
We retest each fix and confirm it landed — recrawl the URL, check the rendered HTML, watch the indexing status change. A fix that was never verified is only a change.
Monitor
Sites regress on deploy. We keep watching crawl stats, indexing counts and Core Web Vitals so the next theme update or plugin does not quietly undo the work.
The Numbers Your Site Is Actually Graded Against
- 2.5s
- LCP — largest element painted
- 200ms
- INP — response to interaction
- 0.1
- CLS — layout shift score
- 75th
- Percentile Google scores you at
Thresholds published by Google in the Core Web Vitals documentation. A page passes only when the 75th percentile of real visits meets all three, measured separately for mobile and desktop over a rolling 28-day window. Meeting them supports a better page experience — it does not guarantee higher rankings, and relevance still outweighs speed.
Technical SEO for Growing Businesses
The technical problems that matter are not the same for every business. These are the five patterns we see most often across US companies, and what tends to break in each.
Small businesses about to invest in content
The worst time to find a technical fault is after paying for thirty articles. If pages are slow to index or internal linking is thin, that content underperforms for reasons that have nothing to do with how well it was written. Fixing the foundation first is cheaper than diagnosing it later.
Ecommerce and Shopify stores
Faceted navigation, sort parameters and product variants can generate thousands of near-identical URLs, which is the fastest way to spend crawl budget on pages nobody searches for. Out-of-stock handling, pagination and canonical rules on category pages are where most of the work sits. This overlaps heavily with ecommerce SEO.
SaaS and application-led companies
Marketing pages built inside a JavaScript app are the classic case of content that renders for users but not reliably for crawlers. Add a docs subdomain, a changelog and programmatic landing pages, and rendering plus architecture becomes the main constraint on organic growth.
Multi-location and service businesses
Location and service pages only work if each is genuinely distinct, correctly canonicalized and properly linked from the site structure. Where they are near-duplicates of one another, the usual result is that Google indexes a few and ignores the rest — which caps local SEO before it starts.
Large sites, redesigns and migrations
Most severe traffic losses we are called about trace back to a deployment, not an algorithm update. URLs that changed without redirects, a staging noindex left in production, or navigation rebuilt in JavaScript will each do it. At scale, crawl budget and redirect chains become real constraints rather than theoretical ones.
First-Call Questions
What Clients Ask Before They Hire Anyone
The questions below are the ones clients ask on the first call, answered properly rather than in a sentence. If you only read one, read the one about crawled but not indexed — it is the single most common reason a site with good content still gets no traffic.
What is technical SEO, exactly?
Technical SEO is the work that makes a website usable by a search engine: crawlable, indexable, fast, and structurally clear. It is separate from writing content and separate from earning links, and it comes before both, because neither one pays off on a page Google cannot reach or read.
The useful way to think about it is as three questions asked in order. Can a search engine get to this page? Once there, can it understand what the page is and decide it is worth storing? And when a person opens it, does what they came for appear quickly and stay where they expect? Fail the first and nothing else is evaluated. Fail the second and the page exists but is not eligible to rank. Fail the third and you may rank, but the visit is worse than a competitor whose page does not fight the reader.
None of it is glamorous. Most of the wins are unglamorous too — a robots.txt rule blocking a whole directory, a canonical pointing at the wrong URL, an image nobody compressed. That is exactly why it gets skipped, and exactly why it is so often where the traffic is hiding.
Why is my page crawled but not indexed?
Crawled — currently not indexed means Google fetched the page and has not stored it. It is usually an evaluation rather than an error, which is why there is no button to fix it and why it frustrates people so much.
There is rarely a single cause, and Google does not tell you which one applies. What follows are the patterns we see most often. Diagnosing which is in play on a given URL takes looking at the page, not guessing from the label.
- Duplication — a filtered category, a paginated variant, a print view, or several URLs serving near-identical copy. Google tends to keep one and set the others aside.
- Thin value against the query. Not short: thin. A 300-word page can be indexed if it fully answers something. A 1,500-word page that adds nothing to what already ranks often will not be.
- Weak internal linking. A page reachable only from the sitemap reads as low priority, because your own linking is treated as a signal of what matters on your site.
- Canonical conflicts — a canonical tag pointing somewhere else, or contradicting the sitemap, tells Google to index a different URL than the one you meant.
- Crawl prioritization. On large sites, budget spent on parameter URLs, expired listings and redirect chains leaves the pages you care about further back in the queue.
How we actually diagnose it
We pull the affected URLs out of Search Console, then crawl them ourselves with rendering on to see the page the way Googlebot does after JavaScript runs. Then we compare that rendered output against the indexed pages competing for the same query. Usually the answer is visible within an hour, and usually it is duplication or internal linking rather than anything exotic.
Does JavaScript hurt SEO?
No — JavaScript does not automatically hurt SEO, and plenty of JavaScript sites rank perfectly well. Google renders JavaScript and has done for years. Problems appear when something a search engine depends on is reachable only after rendering that does not reliably complete.
The failures we find most often are main content that arrives via a client-side fetch, internal links built as click handlers rather than real anchor tags, and titles or canonicals written by script after load. In each case a person sees a normal page and the crawler may see an empty shell.
The fix is rarely to abandon your framework. It is to get the things search engines rely on — main copy, internal links, head tags — into the HTML the server sends, through server-side rendering, static generation, or prerendering. The rest can stay client-side without penalty.
This site is a working example: it is a React application, prerendered to static HTML at build time, which is why every page here returns its full content and metadata in the initial response.
How is technical SEO different from on-page SEO?
Technical SEO decides whether a page can compete. On-page SEO decides whether it deserves to. They are usually sold together and are genuinely different jobs.
On-page work is about the page against a query: what it targets, how the headings are structured, how completely it answers the question, how it links onward. Technical work is about the site as a system — architecture, crawl paths, indexing rules, rendering, speed, structured data.
The reason the distinction matters is that they fail in ways that look identical from the outside. Traffic is flat, rankings are stuck. But if the page is not indexed, rewriting it is wasted effort, and if the page is indexed and simply weaker than what ranks above it, a faster server will not save it. The first job is always to work out which of the two you have. That is what an SEO audit is for.
How do I know if my site has a technical problem at all?
The clearest single signal is a gap between the pages you have published and the pages Google has indexed. If 400 are live and Search Console shows 120 indexed, no amount of new content will outrun that.
A few other patterns point the same way: new pages taking weeks to appear when they used to take days, traffic falling off a cliff on one specific date (usually a deployment, not an algorithm update), a rising count under Page indexing, or mobile field data far worse than desktop.
Questions,answered.
A full rendered crawl of your site, cross-referenced against Search Console and real-user field data. It covers crawlability, indexation, rendering, site architecture, internal linking, redirects, canonicals, duplicate content, Core Web Vitals, mobile usability, structured data and sitemap health. You get a prioritized fix list, not a raw error dump.
We fix them. Where we have access we implement directly; where the work sits inside your codebase we hand your developers exact, specific changes and verify the result once shipped. You should not be left holding a PDF of homework.
The crawl and prioritized fix list takes about two weeks, implementation another two to six depending on site size. Results run on a different clock: indexing changes can appear within days of a recrawl, ranking and traffic effects usually take six to twelve weeks to read clearly, and Core Web Vitals need up to 28 days to re-report because Google uses a rolling window of real visits. Anyone giving you a fixed date is guessing.
Three things, collected from real Chrome users rather than a testing tool. LCP times how long until the largest element has painted (2.5 seconds or less is good). INP measures the delay between an interaction and the screen visibly changing (200 milliseconds or less), and replaced FID in March 2024. CLS scores how much content jumps while loading (0.1 or less). Google evaluates all three at the 75th percentile of visits.
PageSpeed Insights shows two separate things. The score is a simulated lab test of one load; the Core Web Vitals assessment above it is real user data from the past 28 days. Actual visitors are on slower devices and worse connections, so field data can fail while the lab score looks excellent. Field data is what counts.
Every change is tested on staging where one exists, and validated after release. Redirect rules and canonical changes carry the most risk, so those are reviewed with you before they go live rather than shipped quietly.
Search Console and analytics read access to start — that is enough to run the audit. Implementation needs whatever your stack requires: CMS access, a repository branch, or a working relationship with your development team. We can work entirely through your developers if you prefer.
The initial cleanup is a project; keeping it clean is ongoing. Sites regress whenever a theme updates, a plugin is added or a release ships. A large share of the damage we find was introduced by a deployment nobody connected to the traffic drop.
Yes — speed work is a core part of it. Server response time, render-blocking CSS and JavaScript, uncompressed images, missing caching and unreserved image dimensions are the usual causes, and all are fixable. What matters is that improvements show up in field data from real visitors, not only in a lab score.
It is often where ecommerce gains the most. Faceted navigation, sort parameters and product variants can create thousands of near-duplicate URLs that consume crawl budget without ever ranking. Getting canonicals, parameter handling, pagination and out-of-stock behavior right is usually worth more than adding new content.
Often, yes — redesign losses are usually technical rather than editorial. The common causes are URLs that changed without redirects, a staging noindex left in production, navigation rebuilt in JavaScript, or content quietly cut during the rebuild. All four are diagnosable and most are reversible.
A consultant advises; the fixes still land on someone else's queue. We are set up to do both — diagnose and implement — which matters because the gap between a correct recommendation and a shipped change is where most technical SEO projects quietly die.
Still deciding if technical seo services is right for you?
Talk to UsTechnical SEO That Gives Your Site Room to Grow
A website can have genuinely good content and still underperform, because search engines never get a clean look at it. That is an uncomfortable thing to discover after a year of publishing, and it is more common than most business owners expect.
The point of technical SEO is not a perfect score in a testing tool. Scores are proxies, and chasing them produces work that looks productive and changes nothing. The point is to remove specific obstacles — a page that cannot be reached, a template that renders empty for a crawler, a redirect chain quietly bleeding equity — so the pages you already have can be found, understood and judged on their merits.
That work compounds. A site with clean architecture and reliable indexing gets more out of every article published afterward, every link earned, every page added. A site without it pays a tax on all three, indefinitely, without ever seeing the invoice.
We treat the technical layer as an asset to maintain rather than a checklist to clear once. Start with an audit, fix what is genuinely holding the site back, verify it landed, and keep watching — because the next regression usually arrives with the next deployment.
Free Technical SEO Audit
Find Out What Is Holding Your Website Back
Send us your domain. We will crawl it, identify the technical issues capping your organic performance, and give you a prioritized list of what to fix first — whether you hire us to do it or not.
Claim Your Free Marketing Audit
Enhance Your Brand Potential At No Cost!
- Expect a response within 24 hours
- NDA available upon request
- Dedicated product specialists