Auction Insights First
Impression share, overlap and position data straight from the account, not from a third-party estimate.
Your Google Ads competitors are whoever appears in the same auctions, which is not necessarily who you compete with commercially. Google Ads competitor analysis reads the auction insights report and the ads actually running, then answers the only question that matters: which of what they are doing is worth responding to, and which is worth ignoring.
Google reports who else appeared in your auctions. Most accounts never look.
Impression share, overlap and position data straight from the account, not from a third-party estimate.
What competitors actually say, and what offer they lead with.
Where their click goes and what it asks the visitor to do.
Not everything a competitor does needs answering. Most of it does not.
Third-party spend and traffic estimates are not used, because we cannot verify them.
More than most advertisers use, and less than the tools claim.
Review My Auctions →Auction insights names the domains sharing your auctions and how often.
Position-above-rate, which is more useful than average position ever was.
Ad copy and extensions are public. So are the landing pages behind them.
Their budget, their conversion rate and their cost per acquisition. Estimates of those are estimates.
Observable data, interpreted, ending in a short list of things worth doing.
Competitive position changes slowly. This is worth repeating occasionally, not monthly.
Starting from the account rather than from a tool, because the account has data the tool is estimating.
Who appears, how often, and at what position relative to you.
By campaign and by device, because competitors differ across both.
Copy, extensions and offers, recorded rather than remembered.
Their landing pages against yours for the same query.
A short list of what is worth changing, and what is not.
A report inside every Google Ads account that most advertisers have never opened.
Impression share is the proportion of available impressions your ads received. Google also reports why you lost the rest: budget, or rank.
Those two have completely different remedies. Lost to budget means the money ran out and more would buy more. Lost to rank means bids or quality were insufficient, and more budget alone changes nothing.
Advertisers routinely raise budgets to fix a rank problem, which spends more without appearing more. The distinction is in the report.
Overlap rate is how often another advertiser appeared in the same auction as you. A high overlap with a competitor means you are consistently competing for the same queries; a low one means you are mostly reaching different searches.
It is most useful as a filter. A competitor who overlaps with you rarely is not really your Google Ads competitor, however much they compete with you commercially — and responding to their strategy is responding to something that does not affect you.
It also identifies the reverse: a domain you had not considered a rival that appears in most of your auctions.







Google Ads competitor analysis examines who shares your ad auctions and what they are doing — using auction insights from your own account plus the ads and landing pages they actually run.
No. Third-party tools estimate spend, and those estimates are inferences rather than data. We do not present them as facts because we cannot verify them.
A report inside Google Ads showing which other domains appeared in your auctions, how often, how frequently they outranked you, and your impression share. It is the most reliable competitive data available to any advertiser.
No. Most competitor activity does not affect you, particularly from advertisers with low overlap. The useful output is a short list of things worth responding to and a longer one of things to ignore.
Occasionally rather than routinely. Competitive position changes over quarters, not weeks, and monthly competitor reports mostly document noise.
Still deciding if google ads competitor analysis is right for you?
Talk to UsEvery Google Ads account reports its lost impression share in two separate columns: share lost to budget, and share lost to rank. They sit next to each other and are frequently read as one number.
They call for opposite responses. Lost to budget means the account stopped running because the money ran out — more budget produces more impressions immediately. Lost to rank means the ads were eligible and did not win, which more budget does not change at all.
Raising spend to solve a rank problem is one of the most common and most expensive misreadings in paid search. The answer was in the report, in a column right beside the one being looked at.
Give us read-only access. We will read auction insights, show you who shares your auctions and how often, and separate the impression share you lost to budget from what you lost to rank.
