Reader First
What decision this document supports.
Most social reports are exports: every metric the platform offers, arranged into a document nobody reads past the first page. Social media reporting should start from what the reader is deciding — whether to continue, whether to spend more, what to change — and contain what answers that.
A report that would look identical whether the channel worked or not is not a report.
What decision this document supports.
So they cannot be chosen after the fact.
The same numbers meaning the same things each month.
Including what we think went wrong.
Impressions are exposure, not an outcome.
Four things, and a metric dump is none of them.
Discuss Your Reporting →Against the measures agreed in advance.
The explanation, which is the part that takes work.
What is being done differently as a result.
Stated, rather than implied to be measured.
Definition, cadence and a document someone reads.
What the numbers mean is covered by social media analytics.
Agree the measures first. A report designed after the period is an argument.
And the decision they are making.
Before the period starts.
So they hold across periods.
Why it happened, including when it went badly.
What changes as a result.
With enough numbers available, something always went up.
A platform exports dozens of measures across several time comparisons. In any period, some of them improved. A report built after the fact can lead with those.
It is not usually deliberate deception. It is the natural output of assembling a report from whatever the data shows, under pressure to demonstrate progress.
Fixing the metrics before the period removes the possibility. The report then shows what was agreed to matter, whether or not it moved.
Because a reporting relationship where results are always positive stops being informative, and readers work that out.
A report that says performance fell, here is what we think caused it, here is what we are changing, is more useful than one that found something to celebrate — and considerably more credible.
It also makes the good months mean something, which is the practical argument for it.







A social platform exports several dozen measures, each available across a handful of time comparisons. That is a large number of numbers.
In any given month, some of them improved. A report assembled after the period, by someone who needs to show progress, will find them — not through dishonesty, but because that is what assembling a report from available data produces.
Agreeing three measures before the month starts removes the possibility entirely, and it is resisted for exactly that reason.
Send us a recent social report. We will tell you what decision it supports and what it is leaving out.

Social media reporting communicates what social activity produced to the people making decisions about it — using measures agreed in advance, consistent definitions and commentary on why.